RICHARD W. SYMONDS (RWS) - INDEPENDENT ANALYST

This comment has been removed by the author.
 

I see the length of the title of the post doesn't allow for the first comment to appear clearly, so I'm deleting and repeating it here:

Sorry, Richard, it is not WHO but WHAT controls the world.
 

The 'System' is run by people.

It is self-perpetuating, I grant you, and can appear to run by itself - but that is an illusion to my mind.

People control the 'System', regulate it and adjust it.

The 'System' can be turned off and on, up and down, by those who control it.

I'm sticking with "WHO", Jose.
 

I don't think that is the way, Richard. Sorry.
 

Rothschild...

He wouldn't be related to the Rothschilds so accused by the fascists in the 1930s would he?

You've been at the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Richard?
 

Sounds interesting, Danivon...tell us more if you can.
 

I think Danivon is referring to people who believe in conspiracy theories whereby Jews like the Rothschilds run the world through their moneypower. Arguably true up until the Second World War but since then the global capitalist/international financier community is much more cosmopolitan and includes people of all races.

Richard: re your comment on the previous thread about American Imperialism, what the Americans don't realise is that there is one Super-power bigger and more powerful than them. It's called the rest of the world put together.

Jeff
 

So what do you think of this, Jeff :

http://www.fdrs.org/rothschild_fortune.html
 

I think that article on the Rothschilds is substantially correct. They are clearly still a major player in global capitalism, what we used to call International finance.

But there are plenty of goys involved these days, people of all races and nations. It's not an exclusively Jewish club as before the last war. Around 1939, one of the Rothschilds who was a friend of the Duke of Windsor happened to be with him in the company of the M person (you know, the one I don't mention any more). As the Rothschild rose to leave he said to the M person "By the way, don't believe this business about a Jewish world conspiracy. We've tried it but it doesn't work. They're too anarchic".

Some 10 years ago I came across an open Special Branch document that mentioned the part the M person's wife played in the release of the Austrian Rothschild from a Gestapo jail. I asked her about it in a letter but in her reply she ignored the question. She never lied, she just ignored unwelcome questions. Years later I found out what the Austrian Rothschild business was all about and realised why she didn't want to talk about it.

But I digress, the question must be How does the world get rid of the money power? The power of which is not to be underestimated. It can be done, the communists in Russia broke its power in their lands - but then replaced it with an even greater evil.

I'm afraid its not enough to have the knowledge and then attempt to communicate it to the suffering masses. It needs a few men and women of charisma (one would do actually), special people who can win the minds and hearts of the masses (like in more local terms Lech Welenska did in Poland and Harval in Czeckoslovakia).

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be anyone on the horizon with that special combination of natural leadership, intellect, saintliness and magnetic personality.

Some day our Prince will come.
 

Why can't the United Nations be that "Prince" - and fulfil its 1948 Charter - after extracting itself from US control, of course.
 

Jeff's comments make sense, I would like to add though that only one person to lead that hypothetical movement is not the solution. In my opinion the solution lies on the strong will of many to change the system. There are people young and energetic enough to gather together and undertake the process, one person outstanding above others will end up by gathering power about her/himself.

Exactly the same as Rothschild by himself cannot perpetuate the system.
 

Richard - the UN has important work to do. But to persuade every other country in the world, or even the majority, that the time has come to shake off global capitalism would take a generation. Maybe two.

Let's start with what we've got: Europe. It would take time enough to get the majority of European countries on baord, let alone wait for the rest of the world to agree.

If Europe announced it was going to outlaw global capitalism from its terretories it would go like an electric shock of awakening around the world. We would set an example that others could either follow or not as they wish.

But what are we to replace capitalism with? Not state socialism which didn't work in the nationalised industries in the UK and didn't work in Russia. And Lord knows, they spent 70 years trying to make it work there before they admitted it was a dud. Because it is devoid of enterprise, initiative and incentive.

The real alternative is Syndicalism: the idea that every industry or business should be owned (and the the profits go to)the people who work in that enterprise. Existing shareholders would be paid off and divided amongst the employees who would also have the right to dismiss inefficient directors and vote on important decisions effecting the company.

Someone's got to own industry and commerce. Why not the workers (we'd have to give it a modern title like Stakeholder Equity or somesuch) rather than the state or capital owning individuals.

How does that Lennen song go: "You may call me a dreamer..."

Jose: History is always made by great men and women, no getting away from it. Christ, Mohammed, Churchill, De Gaulle, the guy who invented penicillin. It's a people world, even though people have flaws. You are rightly suspicious of leaders because they've let you down so often. But we need a new breed of leader, not motivated by the Will to Comfort or the Will to Power but the Will to Achievement.

The people of this country are asleep, we need someone to give them their wake-up call.