Saturday, July 14, 2007
"THEY ARE KILLING US"
(Source : National Security Study Memorandum 200 : Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests - 1974)
It is my considered view that "THEY ARE KILLING US" - A Policy of Social Darwinism - An 'Intentional Genocide' Hypothesis.
First things first : (a) Who are "THEY" (b) WHO ARE "US"
1. "THEY" are ....
2. "US" are ....
More to follow, but I would appreciate any comments - any comments...
Kissinger, Ethnic Cleansing, FDA, Pharma, Psych screening, Codex, Aspartame, The Third World and Everything!
March 11, 2007
Weapons for Winning a War Without Fighting
" You are a target in a war. So are your children, grandchildren, parents, and the people half way around the world whom you have never met. The war is for resources and you are in the way.
You Are In the Way. It's that simple.
US foreign policy became very clear in the December 10, 1974 National Security Study Memorandum, "NSSM 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests" also called the Kissinger Document. In it, an explicit policy by which the US would promote rapid population decline in 13 countries was articulated. Kissinger's now famous (and declassified) quote sums up the elaborate plan:
"Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries."
NSSM 200 became official US policy in November 1975 under President Gerald Ford. Birth control, war and famine were all tools to serve US access to mineral resources without impediments caused by third word populations who were to be eliminated. Brent Scowcroft, Kissinger's replacement as National Security Adviser was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, along with the Secretaries of State, Treasury, Defense, and Agriculture.
Carrying out this depopulation agenda, other agencies besides those most closely identified publicly with the US are active as well.
Former Brazilian Health Minster Carlos Santana, for example, pointed out that "The World Bank, through their reports of its Presidents, has always made its proselytizing for a rigid birth control policy explicit," and that included in World Bank credit packages and investment in Third World countries is an implicit agenda of depopulation. He questioned why Brazil was targeted for birth reduction, with approximately forty per cent of Brazilian woman having been already sterilized.
Quotes Worth Noting
The architects and engineers of global depopulation include iconic figures, corporate and governmental leaders and national decision-makers.
Depopulation programs worldwide are directed and funded by major international money interests, including McGeorge Bundy of the Council on Foreign Relations, (the architect of the US nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction or MAD policy); Warren E. Buffet, the second wealthiest man in the United States; and, long term supporters of eugenics, the Rockefellers.
In 1998, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, announced "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."**
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon Magazine said, "A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal," and is using his purported $1Billion "gift" to the UN to further global depopulation programs.
UNESCO Courier, Jacques-Yves Cousteau, the famous Emmy award winning film producer and ambassador for the environmental movement, said in 1991,
"It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day."
As Alex Jones pointed out, "That works out to 127,750,000 people per year, and 1.27 billion people over 10 years."***
But what about the US? Is anyone trying to get rid of us? Look at what the USDA and FDA permit as "food" and tell me whether the preventable diseases of under nutrition and toxicity which are killing us to the great profit of the "Bigs" (Big Pharma at the top of the list, of course, but Big Chema, Big Biotechna, Big Abgribiz and Big Medica) could possibly have been regulated this disastrously by accident alone.
Help Me Out Here
Tell me if you believe
* That the permission to market spectacularly toxic drugs long after their dangers are know is caused by simple incompetence and greed.
* That the policies which support regulators who consistently protect drugs and pesticides and GM "FrankenFoods" which are killing the American population are the simple results of corruption.
* That the CDC's decision to hide the harm being done to our young while protecting the vaccine industry's profits is mere corruption or whether somewhere, at some level, the real impact of treatments and procedures which are destroying our population through completely preventable disasters is simply a grave error of judgment and that the scientists who try to correct these problems in the regulatory agencies are intimidated and harassed as random acts of administrative error.
* That a multi-trillion dollar business which treats people with chemotherapy agents which the industry supported American Cancer Society admits provides any benefit for a mere 3-4% of people suffering from cancer while the US government ruthlessly suppresses effective, inexpensive and safe cancer treatments is simply a result of unalloyed greed.
If so, then you can buy the notion that the disastrous (and wildly profitable) deaths by pharmaceuticals which account for huge numbers of preventable deaths in the developed world (according to journals like the Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet, etc.) could be due to corrupt regulators alone.
It also means that you buy the story that degraded and depleted food laced with poisons is regulated onto our tables and shelves by accident. That Donald Rumsfeld's statement (as the CEO of Searle) that he wanted Aspartame approved by the FDA and he did "not care how many people it killed" was just a poor turn of phrase.
That means that you are comfortable that the depopulation agenda being so vigorously pursued elsewhere in the world does not touch the shores of the US.
Are You Disposable?
No one, rich or poor, believes they are disposable. And they are right.
I have traveled to places populated by some of the most abjectly poor people in the world on the health freedom trail. People without any way out of that abject poverty, people starving and watching their children starve, have not been willing, just as you and I are not willing, to hold up their hands and say, "Yes, I am a useless eater! For the sake of the elite and their comforts, my children and I are willing to be eliminated."
Yet read what a leading proponent of eugenics/depopulation has to say about those stubborn people who for some reason will not willingly class themselves as useless eaters for their own good!:
"The very word eugenics is in disrepute in some quarters … We must ask ourselves, what have we done wrong?
I think we have failed to take into account a trait which is almost universal and is very deep in human nature. People simply are not willing to accept the idea that the genetic base on which their character was formed is inferior and should not be repeated in the next generation. We have asked whole groups of people to accept this idea and we have asked individuals to accept it. They have constantly refused and we have all but killed the eugenic movement … they won't accept the idea that they are in general second rate. We must rely on other motivation. … it is surely possible to build a system of voluntary unconscious selection. But the reasons advanced must be generally acceptable reasons. Let’s stop telling anyone that they have a generally inferior genetic quality, for they will never agree. Let's base our proposals on the desirability of having children born in homes where they will get affectionate and responsible care, and perhaps our proposals will be accepted."
- From Galton and Mid Century Eugenics by Frederick Osborn, Galton Lecture 1956, in Eugenics Review, vol. 48, 1, 1956
Using food as a weapon goes back to the beginning of inter-group struggle. Sieges are mounted to starve the opposing side. Scorched earth policies deprive peasant and warrior alike of the food they need to survive. Food has been a weapon of tribal and national policy since there were tribes and nations. The US upper echelon policy makers and their friends the would-be masters of the planet have taken this ancient form of intentional misery and death one step further.
With chilling directness, food was officially weaponized by NSSM 200 which the US has never repudiated. The document states, "Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion."…. "Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now," the document continued, adding, "Would food be considered an instrument of national power? … Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can't/won’t control their population growth?" Among the conclusions reached by NSSM 200 is that "mandatory [emphasis added] population control measures" may be "appropriate."* NSSM 200 states that "large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades — a kind the world thought had been permanently banished, … can be expected" as policy events and points out "In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion" and suggests that the UN and other agencies be used to carry out these policies.
Codex: A Perfect Disguise
Codex works perfectly for that purpose. If you were turning food into a tool of depopulation and political control, wouldn't you do exactly what the Codex Commission has done? Wouldn't you create a high sounding international body to "protect consumer health" and "ensure the free trade of food" while bringing your less developed brethren along to develop their "science based" agriculture and food processing capabilities? Wouldn't you make sure that higher and higher levels of deadly chemicals, hormones and other toxins (including heavy metals and animal drug residues) were lacing their foods and get them to want to pay you premium prices for helping them to contaminate their own food and buy your illness-inducing "food" at the same time? Wouldn't you set up seemingly scientific "risk analysis" procedures to mandate global mal- and under-nutrition knowing that, as Linus Pauling said, "every disease is caused by a nutritional deficiency"? Then you could sanctimoniously declare that the "preventable diseases of under nutrition" were killing more and more and more people and wasn't it terrible!
Supposedly "Science Based" and advisory in nature, and backed up by WTO trade sanctions (unless countries follow our two step protective strategy), Codex serves the interests of the multinational corporations which are controlled by people whose idea of a really great planet is one without 5/6 of the people on it now. You have to hand it to the would-be masters: Codex is a brilliantly constructed, glossy and beautifully crafted deception and disinformation system.
Third world countries are led down the disastrous garden path of depleted and damaged food resulting in peoples with weakened immune systems who are under nourished and over fed on nutrient poor food. Their food is irradiated, contaminated with highly profitable chemicals, genetically modified foods and the results are inevitable.
Codex Delegates Disinformed
The men and women who attend Codex as National Representatives and Delegates, by the way, are, in my experience, in the main, good, decent and hard working people who have been totally hoodwinked by brilliant misrepresentation and pseudo science. The amazing thing is how quickly they convert their nagging suspicions and unease to clear understanding when we present the facts as we understand them in personal and direct conversation.
We Are the Ones We’ve Been Waiting For
Success in taking back our food and our freedom is really up to us. We have the information and we have the power to take back our futures. This war has been brought to our tables and our bodies. It is up to us to "Join the Mouth Revolution" in more ways than just spitting out fake food. We need to speak, we need to educate, we need to purchase healthy foods and nutrients, and we need to share what we know with everyone we reach. The stakes are literally life and death. Yours, mine and theirs.
No army can fight without resources. Human resources are precious and so are monetary resources. We need your creativity as volunteers, organizers, and artists. And, yes, we need your donation.
We still have $22,341 to raise by the end of March in order to meet our goal. It’s really important that we do meet it so we can continue our work. We need your help. "
Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Natural Solutions Foundation
** Reported by Deutsche Pres Agentur, August 1998
You can't make any real money without a boogeyman, and the new "Bird Flu" hoax is the latest scam used to generate profits for pharmaceutical company insiders.
"Finally, the pieces of the puzzle start to add up," writes Dr. Joseph Mercola, author of the "Total Health Program." "President Bush sought to instill panic in this country by telling us a minimum of 200,000 people will die from the avian flu pandemic but it could be as bad as 2 million deaths in this country alone.
"This hoax is then used to justify the immediate purchase of 80 million doses of Tamiflu, a worthless drug that in no way shape or form treats the avian flu, but only decreases the amount of days one is sick and can actually contribute to the virus having more lethal mutations," Mercola continues.
President George Bush’s suggestion that a bird flu pandemic might make it necessary to call in the military has led to suggestions that he plans martial law. For example, Texas Congressman Ron Paul “has accused the Bush administration of attempting to set in motion a militarized police state in America by enacting gun confiscation martial law provisions in the event of an avian flu pandemic.”
Here’s a writer at Countercurrents.org:
The next "national emergency" -- possibly a flu pandemic -- could be democracy's last hurrah. Bush is already boasting of using the military to "quarantine" those affected. And it won't be in our homes -- this isn't the measles with the school nurse tacking a "quarantined" sign on our front doors. Last year, Bush authorized preliminary studies for the rapid construction of a National Detention Center Program, complete with a series of detention centers, to be added to the existing 600 units now in place. Also, The Department of Homeland Security is consulting with an Israeli company, Israeli Prison Systems, Ltd., for the expedited construction of modular internment camps to be located in rural areas throughout the continental US and Alaska.
Some believe bird flu is deliberately intended to reduce the world’s population. Writer Leonard G. Horowitz has stated: “
If avian flu becomes more than a threatened pandemic, it will have done so by political and economic design. This thesis is supported by current massive media misrepresentations, profiteering on risky and valueless vaccines, gross neglect of data evidencing earlier similar man-made plagues including SARS, West Nile Virus, AIDS and more; continuance of genetic studies breeding more mutant flu viruses likely to outbreak, inside trading scandals involving pandemic savvy White House and drug industry officials, curious immunity of these pharmaceutical entities over the past century to law enforcement and mainstream media scrutiny, and published official depopulation objectives. With the revelations and assertions advanced herein, the public is forewarned against this physician assisted mass murder…This genocidal imposition is expected to serve mainly economic and political depopulation objectives.
Copyright © 2006